top of page
Using a Tablet


External review of an accreditation agency like the International Education Board (IEB) is a crucial process to ensure transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement in its accreditation practices. Here's how external review typically works:


1. Selection of External Reviewers: The IEB appoints external reviewers who are experts in the field of education, accreditation, and related areas. These reviewers are typically drawn from academia, government agencies, professional associations, and other relevant organizations. The selection process ensures diversity of perspectives and expertise among the external reviewers.


2. Scope of Review: The external review covers various aspects of the IEB's accreditation processes, policies, and practices. This includes evaluating the agency's compliance with established accreditation standards, adherence to best practices in accreditation, effectiveness of accreditation decision-making processes, transparency of operations, and responsiveness to stakeholder feedback.

3. Documentation Review: External reviewers examine documentation provided by the IEB, including accreditation manuals, policies, procedures, accreditation reports, and other relevant materials. They assess the clarity, consistency, and comprehensiveness of these documents in guiding accreditation activities and decision-making.

4. On-Site Visits: External reviewers may conduct on-site visits to observe accreditation processes firsthand and interact with staff, stakeholders, and accredited institutions. These visits provide an opportunity to verify the accuracy of information provided in documentation, assess the implementation of accreditation procedures, and gather additional insights into the agency's operations.

5. Stakeholder Feedback: External reviewers solicit feedback from various stakeholders, including accredited institutions, educational professionals, students, government agencies, and the public. This feedback helps assess the perceptions of stakeholders regarding the IEB's accreditation practices, identify areas for improvement, and validate the agency's effectiveness in serving the needs of the education community.

6. Evaluation and Recommendations: Based on their review, external reviewers evaluate the IEB's accreditation practices and identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT analysis). They provide recommendations for enhancing the agency's effectiveness, efficiency, and transparency, as well as ensuring alignment with evolving trends and standards in education and accreditation.

7. Reporting and Follow-Up: External reviewers prepare a comprehensive report summarizing their findings, conclusions, and recommendations. This report is submitted to the IEB's governing body and may be made available to the public. The IEB then develops an action plan to address the recommendations and implements changes as necessary, with periodic follow-up reviews to assess progress and ensure continuous improvement.

Overall, external review of the International Education Board's accreditation practices is a rigorous process designed to promote accountability, credibility, and quality assurance in higher education accreditation. By engaging external experts and stakeholders in the review process, the IEB can enhance its effectiveness as a accrediting agency and maintain public trust in the accreditation system.

bottom of page